A Bibliometric Analysis on Polio Research Productivity

Authors

  • J. Ramakrishnan S.G. Deputy Librarian, Regional Medical Library, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • G. Ravi Sankar S.G. Deputy Librarian, Regional Medical Library, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • K. Thavamani Assistant Librarian, Regional Medical Library, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2022.12.1.3103

Keywords:

Polio, Relative Growth Rate (RGR), Doubling time (Dt), Bradford Law, Degree of Collaboration

Abstract

Presents a bibliometric analysis of the literature in the discipline of Polio as listed the MEDLINE data which covered in the PubMed for the length 1990-2019.It is found that a total of 18956 records are within the MEDLINE database which covered by PubMed on ‘Polio ’. Maximum number of 1683 records was published during the year 2019, followed by 1672 records in the year 2017 and 1587 records in the year 2018. It became discovered that 76.54% of records are journal articles, followed by Review 12.49%, Editorial 2.60%, Letter 2.44%, Case Report 2.38%, News 2.22%,Comment 1.21%, Published Erratum 0.11%, and Published Retraction 0.01% are included in this look at. Relative Growth Rate (RGR) has been reducing from the year 1991 to 2019 but in a fluctuation trend. On the other hand, the Doubling Time (Dt) has shown an increasing trend, but it is also in a fluctuation of records throughout the examine period. A total of 240 journals were identified as core journals in the subject of Polio literature. The ratio of single and multiple authors publications is 1:6 found within the discipline of Polio literature. The meager percent i.e. 2.02% of records represent nameless authorship. The average Degree of Collaboration arrived at 0.86. It shows that multi-authored papers dominated within the field of Polio literature.

References

Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polio.

Baker D. (1976). Recent trends in the growth of chemical literature. Chemical and Engineering News, 54, 23-27.

Conard, G. M. (1957). Growth of biological literature and the future of biological abstracts. Federal Proceedings, 16, 711-715.

May, K. O. (1966). Quantitative growth of the mathematical literature. Science, 154, 1672-1673.

Lamb, G. H. (1971). The coincidence of quality and quantity in the literature of mathematics. (Ph.D. dissertation, Case Western Reserve University). Dissertation Abstracts International, 32/06-A, 33-40.

Sengupta, I. N. (1973). Recent growth of the literature of biochemistry and changes of ranking of periodicals. Journal of Documentation, 29, 192-211.

Sengupta, I. N. (1974). Choosing physiology journals: A recent study of the growth of its literature. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 20, 39-57.

Sengupta, I. N. (1975). Choosing microbiology journals: Study of the growth of literature in the field. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 21, 39-57.

Ramesh Babu, B. & Ramakrishnan, J. (2007). Trends in the growth of literature on hepatitis (1984-2003), Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 38(2), 31-50.

Schloman, B. E. (1997). Mapping the literature of allied health: project overview, Bulletin of Medical Library Association, 85(3), 271-77.

Ramesh Kundra, et al., (1999). Behavior of Bradford’s Law towards citation data on Indian Medical Journal. In International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics Proceedings, Colima; Mexico. 580.

Ramesh Babu, B. & Ramakrishnan, J. (2007). Indian contributions to the field of hepatitis (1984-2003): A Scientometric Study. In Third International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics, Scientometrics Science and Society & Eighth COLLNET Meeting. ICAR Symposium Hall, National Agriculture Science Complex; New Delhi (India). 22-32.

Lewin, H. S. (2008, April).Diabetes Mellitus publication patterns, 1984-2005. Journal of Medical Library Association, 86(2), 155-158.

Krishnamoorthy, G., Ramakrishnan, J. & Devi, S. (2009, September). Bibliometric Analysis of literature on diabetes (1995-2004). Annals of Library and Information Studies, 54, 150-155.

Macias-Chapula, C. A. (2000). AIDS in Haiti: a bibliometric analysis. Bulletin of Medical Library Association, 88(1), 56-61.

Hartinah, S. et al., (2001). Indonesian Nutrition Research Papers 1979-2000: A Bibliometric Analysis. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics. Bibliometrics & Informetrics Research Group; Sydney [Australia]. 225-34.

Divya Srivastava. (2004). Collaborative Activity in the Field of Biomedical Sciences: A Bibliometric Analysis of Biomedical Publications. In Information and knowledge Management in Health Sciences: Newer Perspectives MLAI 2004 National Convention, Dr. ALM Post Graduate Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Madras; Chennai (India), 181-96.

Hunt, R. (1978). Plant growth analysis: London: Edward Arnold.

Blackman, V. H. (1919). The compound interest law and plant Growth, Annals of Botany, 33, 353-360.

Mahapatra, M. (1985). On the Validity of the theory of Exponential Growth of Scientific Literature, Proceedings of the 15th IASLIC Conference, Bangalore, 61-70.

Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of Information on specific subjects, Engineering, 137, 85-86.

Subramanyam, K. (1993). Bibliometric Studies of Research Collaboration: A Review. Journal of Information Science, 6, 33-38.

Downloads

Published

26-04-2022

How to Cite

Ramakrishnan, J., Ravi Sankar, G., & Thavamani, K. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis on Polio Research Productivity. Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology, 12(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.51983/ajist-2022.12.1.3103

Most read articles by the same author(s)