Scientometric Analysis of Communication Disorders


  • B. Nandeesha Research Scholar, Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Karnataka, India
  • Khaiser Jahan Begum Former Professor, Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Karnataka, India



Communication Disorders, Scientometric Analysis, Web of Science, Authorship Pattern, Citations and Degree of Collaboration


This paper presents the scientometric study of the growth of literature on communication disorders from 1999-2018. The study analyzed and discussed the yearly growth of publications, authorship pattern, citation pattern, co-authorship, most productive authors, and ranking of authors by using various indices. The researcher collected the required data from the Web of Science database. After standardization, the retrieved research literature has been analyzed with scientometric tools and meaningful inferences. The year 2018 has contributed the highest number of research papers, scoring 20948. The keyword ‘Autism’ occurrences in 50744 (35.85%) papers. The Collaboration Index (CI=9.55), Degree of Collaboration (DC=0.97), and Collaboration Coefficient (CC=0.52) of research output in communication disorders. Langguth, Berthold is a most prolific and influential author of hearing disorders research. He published 132 articles with 5682 citations. There is a decrease in compound year growth rate (CAGR=-6.36) in research publications on communication disorders.


Ghosh, N. C. (2014). CSIR-IICB research productivity during 2001-2010: A scientometric analysis of publications. International Research: Journal of Library and Information Science, 4(2), 287-314.

Hu, Z., Chen, C. & Liu, Z. (2014). How are collaboration and productivity correlated at various career stages of scientists? Scientometrics, 101, 1553-1564.

Jahina, S. R., Batcha, M. S., & Ahmad, M. (2020). Lotka’s law and pattern of author productivity in the field of brain concussion research: a scientometric analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-17.

Karunakar, Gadde. (2012). Research performance of CSIR- Indian Institute of Chemical Technology: a scientometric study. Proceedings of the Metrics based Research Assessment and Evaluation, 15-20.

Kumar, S. (2020). Scientometric analysis of research productivity of IIT (ISM) Dhanbad. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-18.

Mohan, B. S., & Kumbar, M. (2020). Scientometric analysis and visualization of solar physics research in India. Science & Technology Libraries, 1-21.

Mukherjee, B. (2017). Research in Indian CSIR laboratories: a bibliometric study. SRELS Journal of Information Management, 54(4), 165-174.

Sengar, K. P. S. (2012). R & D Performance of WoS -IMTECH (India): A scientometric study based on the papers published during 1991–1995 and 2005–2009. Pearl: A Journal of Library and Information Science, 6(3), 121-129.

Sumathi, P., Palaniappan, M., Sargunapathi, R., & Begum, S. S. (2020). A Scientometric analysis of research journal of chemistry and environment (2005-2019). Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-13.

Trimukhe, Dhananjay. (2019). Research productivity of the scientists of CSIR-NCL: A scientometric study. CnR’s International Journal of Social & Scientific Research, 4, 58-64.

Tsay, M. Y., & Lai, C. H. (2018). A scientometric study of heat transfer journal literature from 1900 to 2017. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer, 98, 258-264.




How to Cite

Nandeesha, B., & Begum, K. J. (2023). Scientometric Analysis of Communication Disorders . Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology, 13(2), 39–45.