Academic Relationships and Resources: Assessing the Impact on Quality of Education

Authors

  • M. Pragnashree Research Scholar, Department of Management Science, JNTUA, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • M. Vidyasagar ssociate Professor, Department of Management Studies, SVCET (A) Chittoor, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • T. Narayan Reddy Assistant Professor, Department of Management Science, JNTUA, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh, India

Keywords:

SERVQUAL, Academic Relationship, Higher Education, quality education, Academic Resources

Abstract

The study is an empirical examination of how the academic relationship between Faculty and student, student’s access to resources affect the quality of education in higher education institutions across Andhra Pradesh, India. Data was collected among 400 students across Higher Education institutions in Andhra Pradesh using random sampling technique. Dimensions of SERVQUAL model (ParasurRaman, 1985), namely Responsiveness, Cooperation, Assurance, Empathy, Tangibles (Access to resources) were used in the questionnaire. Cross tabulation in SPSS and Pearson correlation were employed as analytical methods. The findings of the study suggest that the student faculty relationship have a significant impact on quality of education and academic resources are significant attributes that impact the student’s learning which results in better quality of education.

References

Crawford, L. E. D., & Shutler, P. (1999).Total quality management in education: Problems and issues for the classroom teacher. The Internal Journal of Educational Management, 13, 67-72. doi:10.1108/09513549910261122.

Edstrom, K. (2008). Was doing course evaluations as if learning matters most. Higher Education Research and Development, 27, 95-106. doi:10.1080/07294360701805234.

Heck, R.H., & Johnsrud,L.K.(2000),Administrative effectiveness in higher education: improving assessment procedures. Research in Higher Education, 41(6), pp. 663–85

Magolda, Marcia., & Astin, Alexander. (1993). What Matters in College: Four Critical Years Revisited. Educational Researcher. 22. 10.2307/1176821.

Mahiah, S., Suhaimi, S., & Ibrahim, A. (2006). Measuring the level of customer satisfaction among employees of human resource division. Advances in global Business Research, 3.

Mircea, M., & Andreescu, A. J. (2010). Agile system development for the management of service oriented organization. The 11th International Conference on Computer System and Technologies, Sofia, 17- 18 June 2010, 341-346.

Navarro, M. M., Iglesias, M. P., & Torres, P. R. (2005). A new management element of universities: Satisfaction with the courses offered. International Journal of Education Management, 19, 505 526. doi:10.1108/09513540510617454.

Spooren, P., Mortelmans, D., & Denekens, J. (2007). Student evaluation of teaching quality in higher education: Development of an instrument based on 10 Likert-scales. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 667-679. doi:10.1080/02602930601117191.

Wachtel, H. K. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, 191-212. doi:10.1080/0260293980230207.

Wachtel, H. K. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, 191-212. doi:10.1080/0260293980230207.

Zeithaml V. A., & Binter, M. J. (2008). Service marketing integrating customer focus across the firm (4 Ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 108-109.

Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2-22. doi:10.2307/1251446.

Downloads

Published

05-11-2020

How to Cite

Pragnashree, M., Vidyasagar, M., & Narayan Reddy, T. (2020). Academic Relationships and Resources: Assessing the Impact on Quality of Education. Asian Journal of Managerial Science, 9(2), 18–23. Retrieved from https://ojs.trp.org.in/index.php/ajms/article/view/1642