Uncertainty Analysis of Evapotranspiration Estimates in Ecosystems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51983/arme-2012.1.1.2512Keywords:
Evapotranspiration, Uncertainty, Estimate, Ecosystem, Radiation, RadiometerAbstract
Many hydrologic models and agricultural management applications require evapotranspiration estimates. The intensity of evapotranspiration is mainly determined by mathematical models rather than by direct measurement. In addition to its own estimate of evapotranspiration, it is necessary to determine the uncertainty of this estimate. This uncertainty is not usually mentioned. In this paper these formulas are derived for the uncertainty estimate of evapotranspiration under simplifying assumptions. These assumptions enabled one to derive an expression of evapotranspiration estimation uncertainty suitable for practical applications. The paper focuses on both the absolute and the relative uncertainty of evapotranspiration estimation. The derived formulas can be used for determining the uncertainty in evapotranspiration estimation, but as well as for the accuracy estimate which is necessary for the measuring of input variables. The derived relationship shows that the net radiation should be more accurately measured than the other energy fluxes that have an influence on evapotranspiration. It follows that the relative uncertainty of evapotranspiration is primarily influenced by the relative uncertainty of net radiation. The uncertainty in the measurement of net radiation was derived from data obtained by using a radiometer which was equipped with a pair of pyranometers and with a pair of pyrgeometers. Planck’s Law was used for spectral analysis. The possible presence of systematic errors in the measuring of net radiation was evaluated for its potential impact on the errors of the evapotranspiration estimate. This paper is accompanied by measurement records and graphs documenting the achieved results.
References
R.G. Allen, L.S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith, “Crop Evapotranspiration – Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements”. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56, Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations, Rome, pp. 300, 1998.
R. Geiger,R.H. Aron, and P. Todhunter,”The Climate Near the Ground”, Rowman & Littlefield, Maryland, pp. 584, 2003.
Kipp and B.V. Zonen ,”Instruction Manual-Net Radiometer CNR 1”, Delft, Pp. 46,2002.
J. Křeček, and P. Punčochář, “Evapotranspirace”, CVUT in Prague, Available form www: <http://hydrology.fsv. cvut.cz/vyuka/HYKV/ data/Text7-ET.pdf>, 2008.
J.L. Monteith, Principles of Environmental Physics, Edward Arnold (Publishers) Limited, London, pp. 241, 1973.
V. Novák, “Evaporation of water in nature and methods of its determining (in Slovak)”, VEDA SAV, Bratislava, pp. 260, 1995.
A. Ohmura, “Objective Criteria for Rejecting Data for Bowen Ratio Flux Calculations”, Journal of Applied Meteorology, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 595-598, 1982.
H.L. Penman, “Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass”, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, pp. 120-146, 1948.
P.J. Perez, F . Castellvi, M. Ibanez, and J.I. Rosell, “Assessment of reliability of Bowen ratio method for partitioning fluxes”, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Vol. 97, pp.141-150, 1999.
R. Rösemann, “Solar Radiation Measurement”, Reichenbach/Fils, pp. 215, 2004.
B. Taylor,C. Kuyatt, “Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results”, Geithersburg, pp. 20, 1994.
A.D. Ward, S.W. Trimble, Environmental Hydrology, CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, pp. 475, 2004.
Z. Xing, L. Cow, F. Meng, H. Rees, L. Stevens, and J. Monteith, “Validating Evapotranspiraiton Equations Using Bowen Ratio in New Brunswick, Maritime, Canada”, Sensors 2008, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 412- 428, 2008
Z. Žalud, Energetická bilance, MZLU in Brno, Available from www: <http://old.mendelu.cz/~opr/kestazeni/ bioklim/4_ppt.pdf>, 2008.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 The Research Publication
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.