Aerodynamic Simulation and Optimization of Micro Aerial Vehicle Rotor Airfoil at Low Reynolds Number
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51983/arme-2023.12.1.3670Keywords:
Simulation, Optimization, URANS, Spalart-Allmaras, CFD, Aerodynamic PerformancesAbstract
This paper describes the aerodynamic simulation and optimization of NACA 0012 airfoil at a low Reynolds number using unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) and Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model in Ansys Fluent. The purpose of this paper is to simulate and optimize the airfoil to get better aerodynamic performances at low Reynolds numbers. The Parsec method was selected for the optimization of the NACA 0012 airfoil. Both of these airfoils are simulated using CFD Fluent between 0 to 13-degree angle of attack at a low Reynolds number of 200000. To simulate the airfoil, mesh generation is crucial so an O-grid structured mesh is created. After the simulation, several aerodynamic performances are compared between the airfoils, such as lift coefficient, drag coefficient, pressure coefficient, and lift-to-drag ratio. And the calculated results from Xfoil are taken as references. Between NACA 0012 and optimized NACA 0012, the optimized airfoil showed better aerodynamic performances than the normal one, which was the goal of this paper. Later on, the different flow field variables, such as density, temperature, pressure, and vorticity magnitude were analyzed and compared. Both the airfoils at a different angle of attack were analyzed for these functions, like 7°, 11°, and 20° AOA. During the analytical process, Q-criterion appears to be a very important method of vortex identification in the flow field. With this analysis, we came to know, that as the angle of attack increases the adverse pressure gradient also increases, which creates a big reverse flow.
References
W. J. Koning, E. A. Romander, and W. Johnson, “Low Reynolds number airfoil evaluation for the Mars helicopter rotor,” in Annual Forum and Technology Display, No. ARC-E-DAA-TN53889, 2018.
D. K. S. A. M. Sudipto, “Modeling aerodynamics for ultra-low Reynolds Number flight,” in 21th Annual CFD Symposium, Bangalore, India, August, 2019.
T. I. Attari, “CFD analysis and validation for solution to micro air vehicle airframes,” 2004.
K. Shravan and N. Swaroop, “Numerical Investigation of an Airfoil at Low Reynolds Numbers for MAV Application,” in International Conference on Recent Advances in Design, Development and Operation of Micro Air Vehicles, Hyderabad, India, November, 2014.
L. W. Traub and C. J. J. O. A. Coffman, “Efficient low-Reynolds-number airfoils,” Vol. 56, No. 5, pp. 1987-2003, 2019.
I. A. A. S. V. R. Selwyn, “Design of Low Reynolds Number Airfoil for Micro Aerial Vehicle,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, June 2018.
S. Thabet, T. H. J. I. J. O. R. Thabit, and Engineering, “Computational fluid dynamics: science of the future,” Vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 430-433, 2018.
Y. D. A. J. R. R. . K. Raman, “A review on applications of computational fluid dynamics,” International Journal of LNCT, Vol. No. 2, July, 2018.
J. Anderson, in Computational Fluid Dynamics-An Introduction Governing Equations of Fluid Dynamics 3rd edition ed.: Springer, 2009, pp. 26-39.
F. Aqilah, M. Islam, F. Juretic, J. Guerrero, D. Wood, and F. N. J. I. E. J. Ani, “Study of Mesh Quality Improvement for CFD Analysis of an Airfoil,” Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 203-212, 2018.
J. F. G. Dias, Vicente, Akwa and Adriane Prisco Petry, “A Computational Study of the Grid Quality and Convergence in 2D Airfoils for Small Wind Turbine,” in 15th Brazilian Congress of Thermal Sciences and Engineering, Belém, Brazil, November, 2014.
N. P. Salunke, R. Juned Ahamad and S. J. A. J. O. M. E. Channiwala, “Airfoil parameterization techniques: A review,” Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 99-102, 2014.
W. Song and A. Keane, “A study of shape parameterisation methods for airfoil optimisation,” in 10th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, pp. 4482, 2004.
A. Shahrokhi, A. J. A. s. Jahangirian, and technology, “Airfoil shape parameterization for optimum Navier–Stokes design with genetic algorithm,” Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 443-450, 2007.
M. W. Lohry and L. J. A. J. Martinelli, “Unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulation of crossflow rotors, scaling, and blockage effects,” Vol. 54, No. 12, pp. 3828-3839, 2016.
P. V. Raje, “Spalart-Allmaras Turbulence Model For Compressible flows,” Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, India, May, 2015.
V. Kolář and J. J. I. J. O. A. E. Šístek, “Vortex and the balance between vorticity and strain rate,” 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 The Research Publication
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
