Flood Mitigation in Developing Countries: A Case Study of India

Authors

  • Md. Karar Ahmad Assistant Professor (Guest), Department of Geography, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2018.7.1.1378

Keywords:

Floods, Natural Disasters, Mitigation Measures, Developing Countries, India

Abstract

Floods are the common natural disasters in most of the developing countries, and India isno exception.Due to the geographic and climatic conditions the country remains under threat. Floods have been recurrent phenomenon in many parts of India, causing loss of lives and public property and bringing untold misery to the people. The floods that occurred in India in 2013 were highly catastrophic based on the number of victims. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, IFRC (2013) continues to steer the evacuation efforts as well as in rescuing the stranded victims. Methods of structural control of floodwater can be grouped into four types; namely, storage, diversion, enhancing channel capacity, and constriction of the water within the channel. The following flood mitigation measures could be adopted to mitigate the adverse impacts of severe floods and to prevent normal floods. Flood walls are constructed out of materials such as concrete or steel in order to control the flow of flood waters and prevent the flooding of specific areas. The construction of floodwalls and embankments has been the traditional means of protecting low lying communities and infrastructure against flooding. Flood hazard maps contain information about the probability or magnitude of an event whereas flood risk maps contain additional information about the consequences. Flood insurance is one of the effective ways in order to cope with the aftermaths of flood events. The Indian government acknowledges the problems the country faces because of the various natural disasters that occur. Consequently, various agencies have been instituted to evaluate the country’s exposure to disasters and to develop ways of mitigating or managing the impacts of the disasters.

References

Attri, & Tyagi. (2010). Climate Profile of India. Contribution to the Indian Network of Climate Change Assessment (NATIONAL COMMUNICATION-II), Ministry of Environment and Forests, India Meteorological Department, New Delhi.

Andjelkovic. (2001). Guidelines on non-structural measures in urban flood management. Technical documents in hydrology, Paris: UNESCO, International Hydrological Programme.

Annual Disaster Statistical Review: The numbers and trends. (2015). Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED) Institute of Health and Society (IRSS) Universite catholique de Louvain, Belgium.

Collins & Simpson. (2007). The impact of climate change on insuring flood risk. Biennial Convention, Institute of Actuaries of Australia, Christchurch.

Duivendijk, J. V. (1999). Assessment of flood management options: Assessment of flood control and management options. Cape Town: World Commission on Dams.

Imerzeel, Beek, & Bierkens. (2010). Climate change will affect the Asian water towers. Science, 328, 1382–1385.

Kumar and Singh. (2012). Flood events, Fatalities and Damages in India from 1978 to 2006. Natural Hazards, 2(8), 1-20.

Moel. (2009). Flood maps in Europe – methods, availability and use. Natural Hazards Earth System Science, 9, 289-301.

NDMAI. National Disaster Management Guidelines: Management of Floods. New Delhi: National Disaster Management Authority.

Mills E. (2008). Insurance in a climate of change. Science, 309, 1040–1044.

YEN. (1995). Hydrometeorology, Impacts, and Management of Extreme Floods. U.S.- Italy Research Workshop on the Perugia (Italy).

http://www.dpwh.gov.ph/dpwh/news/12097

http://www.barrierforce.com

https://trca.ca/conservation/flood-risk-management

http://www.indiawaterportal.org (Accessed on 21st May 2018).

Downloads

Published

03-04-2018

How to Cite

Karar Ahmad , M. (2018). Flood Mitigation in Developing Countries: A Case Study of India. Asian Review of Social Sciences, 7(1), 91–95. https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2018.7.1.1378