Perception and its Impact on Satisfaction on Performance Appraisal in Real Estate Industry in South India

Authors

  • R. Sridhar Research Scholar, Department of Management Studies, Christ University, Karnataka, India & Vice President, Human Resources, Shriram Properties, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • N. Elangovan Director, National Institute of Fashion Technology, Kannur, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2019.8.S1.1493

Keywords:

Perception, Performance Appraisal, Real Estate

Abstract

Traditionally, real estate industry is managed by small time entrepreneurs and considered as unorganized industry. However, in the last few decades, the real estate industry has become organized sector with many corporate houses started doing business and offering employment to millions. Like any other organized industry, Real estate industry too started practicing performance appraisal to reward their employees and to align their goal with the organization. The nature of the business allows the organizations in Real Estate industry to have diversified work groups. Thus, organization’s role on implementing better performance appraisal system becomes inevitable. This study aims at identifying the perception of the real estate employees on performance appraisal system, organizational role in educating the employee on performance appraisal system and their impact on the satisfaction of the employee on the performance appraisal system practiced in Real Estate companies.

References

Aly, N. A. E. F. M., & El-Shanawany, S. M. (2016). The Influence of Performance Appraisal Satisfaction on Nurses’ Motivation and Their Work Outcomes in Critical Care and Toxicology Units. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 12(20).

Bretz, R. D., Milkovich, G. T., & Read, W. (1992). The Current State of Performance Appraisal Research and Practice: Concerns, Directions and Implications, Centre for Advanced Human Resource Studies.

Cawley, B. D., Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reactions: A meta-analytic review of field investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 615-33.

De Cremer, D., Brockner, J., Fishman, A., Van Dijke, M., van Olffen, W., & Mayer, D. M. (2010). When do procedural fairness and outcome fairness interact to influence employees’ work attitudes and behaviors? The moderating effect of uncertainty. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 291-304.

Jawahar, I. M. (2007). The influence of perceptions of fairness on performance appraisal reactions. Journal of Labour Research, 28(4), 735-54.

Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87(1), 72.

Murphy, K.R., & Cleveland, J.N., (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social, organizational and goal-based perspectives. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Panggabean, M. S. (2001). Performance Appraisal. Manajemen Krida Wacana, 1(2).

Skarlicki D P and Folger R (1997), Retaliation in the Workplace: The Roles of Distributive, Procedural and Interactional Justice, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434-443.

Smither, J. W. (Ed.). (1998). Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice. Pfeiffer.

Shrivastava, A. A., & Purang, P. P. (2011). Employee perceptions of performance appraisals: A comparative study on Indian banks. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(3), 632-647.

Taylor, M.S., Tracy, K.B., Harrison, J.K., & Carroll, S.J. (1995), Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi-experiment in procedural justice, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 495-523.

Thurston Jr., P. W., & McNall, L. (2010). Justice perceptions of performance appraisal practices. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(3), 201-228.

Walsh, M. B. (2003). Perceived fairness of and satisfaction with employee performance appraisal.

Downloads

Published

14-02-2019

How to Cite

Sridhar, R., & Elangovan, N. (2019). Perception and its Impact on Satisfaction on Performance Appraisal in Real Estate Industry in South India. Asian Review of Social Sciences, 8(S1), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2019.8.S1.1493