Assessment for a Sustainable Livelihood Driver: The Economic, Social and Environmental Viewpoint of a Community Extension Program

Authors

  • Kingie G. Micabalo Business and Accountancy University of Cebu, Cebu City, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2022.11.2.3240

Keywords:

Community Growth and Development, Sustainable Livelihood Program, Descriptive-Correlational, Mandaue City, Philippines

Abstract

The academe is regarded as the primary actor capable of empowering people, with the potential to contribute to a better community. School institutions have a mission to connect with the community by providing skill training and information to individuals who are less fortunate in order to help them reach their full potential.The investigation expects to survey the community's status in economic maintainability, social practicality, and ecological quality with an end perspective on building up a sustainable livelihood program centered to advance development and improvement in the community. The 359 residents - respondents of a village in an urban poor area participated in the study using Slovin’s formula to decide the study's sample size on a cluster sampling method in data gathering. Frequency and simple percentage, weighted mean, and Chi-Square Test of Independence were used to treat and interpret the data.The data found that individuals in the area rated social viability highly, while economic sustainability and environmental soundness were rated moderately. The respondents' favored program is the Community Livelihood Program Training Center, whereas the development of People's Cooperative for Businesses, the launch of Community Microfinancing, and Community SME's were rated fairly. The study also discovered a link between the respondents' gender, civil status, educational attainment, monthly income, source of income, and the community's economic, social, and environmental sustainability. Furthermore, the community's economic sustainability, social viability, environmental quality, and selected sustainable livelihood program all have a major relationship. The study concluded that the residents of the village place a high value on the social, economic, and environmental aspects of community growth and development. It also concludes that the community requires a Sustainable Livelihood Training Center, which the people believe is extremely suitable and acceptable for leveraging the community's current situation. People's perceptions of the community's status are influenced by their personal status as a local resident. And, if people's personal status and manner of life improve, a bigger percentage of growth and development in the community will be realized as well.

References

Abrea, R. R. (2017). Impact of Batstateu-college of teacher educationsocio-economic extension services to the Badjao community in Libjo, Batangas City. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Services, 4, 2349-5219. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2INAPBr.

Amaparado, M. A. P., Camayra, M. T., Dorio Jr P. A., & Patindol, D. B.(2017). Sustainable community extension programs for Village Looc, Mandaue City, Cebu, Philippines: The 8th Year Re-assessment. IAMURE Multidisciplinary Research, 19(1), 102-114. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3l6JNXe.

Amparado, M. A. P. & Colonia. G. E. (2020). Community needs assessment of Village Opao, Mandaue City, Cebu, Philippines. Cebu Journal of Teacher Education, 1(1), 83-100, Retrieved fromhttps://bit.ly/2V8rRko.

Ballesteros, M. M., Orbeta, A. C., Corpus, J. P., & Ancheta, J. (2017). Assessment of livelihood success and implementation issues on the Sustainable Livelihood Program of the DSWD. 54(DP), Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3gicsIC.

Basiago, A. D. (1998). Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. Environmentalist, 19(2), 145-161, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3glLNun.

Bridger, J. C., & Luloff, A. E. (1999). Toward an interactional approach to sustainable community development. Journal of rural studies, 15(4), 377-387, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2TLS3E6.

Dale, A. & Onyx, J. Eds. (2010). A dynamic balance: Social capitaland sustainable community development: Is there a Relationship? The University of British Columbia, 2029 West Mall Vancauver, BCV6T IZ2, UBC Press. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3m6HtRs.

Elasha, B. O., Elhassan, N. G., Ahmed, H., & Zakieldin, S. (2005).Sustainable livelihood approach for assessing community resilienceto climate change: case studies from Sudan. Assessments of impacts and adaptations to climate change (AIACC) Working Paper, 17, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2KJnuux.

Elkington, J. (1997). The triple bottom line. Environmental management: Readings and cases, 2.2455 Teller Road Thousand Oaks, California 91320, Sage Publications, Inc. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3fv6qU8.

Ghahramanpouri, A., Lamit, H., & Sedaghatnia, S. Urban socialsustainability trends in research literature. Asian Social Science, 9(4), 185, 2013. https://bit.ly/2Jbc0yW.

Griggs, D., Stafford-Smith, M., Gaffney, O., Rockström, J., Öhman,M.C., Shyamsundar, P., & Noble, I. (2013). Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature, 49(7441), 305-307, Retrieved from https://go.nature.com/2J4swRx.

Gupta, J., Pouw, N. R., & Ros-Tonen, M. A. (2015). Towards anelaborated theory of inclusive development. The European Journal ofDevelopment Research, 27(4), 541-559, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/37fwuPF.

Harder, A., Moore, A., Mazurkewicz, A., & Benge, M. (2013). Problems Impacting Extension Program Quality at the County Level: Results from an Analysis of County Program Reviews Conducted in Florida. Journal of Extension, 51(2), Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3sCYLcM.

Lim. P. K. C., (2011). The Role of Academic Publications in Community Service. International, e-Journal of Science, Medicine & Education, 5(1), 1, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2HpCwUS.

Liang, X., Zhao, X., Wang, M., & Li, Z. (2018). Small and medium-sized enterprises sustainable supply chain financing decision based on triple bottom line theory. Sustainability, 10(11), 4242, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/39bMxR5.

Mitchell, M., Curtis, A., & Davidson, P. (May 2007). Can the ‘triple bottom line concept help organizations respond to sustainability issues? In Conference proceedings in 5th Australian Stream Management Conference), 21-25, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/37asxvA.

Moran, D. D., Wackernagel, M., Kitzes, J. A., Goldfinger, S. H., & Boutaud, A. (2008). Measuring sustainable development -Nation by nation. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 470-474, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3nOKGFO.

Paqueo, V. B., Orbeta, A. C., & Lanzona, L. A. (2016). The impact of legal minimum wages on employment, income, and poverty incidence in the Philippines. PIDS Discussion Paper Series, No. 2016-54, Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS), Quezon City, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3nQGYN2.

Pritchett, L. & Werker, E. (2012). Developing the guts of a GUT (Grand Unified Theory): elite commitment and inclusive growth. Effective States and Inclusive Development Research Centre (ESID) Working Paper, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2IYN6mk.

Ranieri, R., & Almeida Ramos, R. (2013). Inclusive growth: Building up a concept. Working Paper, No. 104, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG), Brasilia, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/338DZ9N.

Rao, P. K. (1999). Sustainable development, 1, 427, Palhar Nagar, RAPTC, VIP-Road, Indore-452005 (MP) India. Blackwell Publishers, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3kSXJUQ.

Sacco, P., & Tavano Blessi, G. (2009). The social viability of culture-led urban transformation processes: evidence from the Bicocca District, Milan. Urban Studies, 46(5-6), 1115-1135, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3glCU4e.

Serrat, O. (2017). The sustainable livelihoods approach. In Knowledge solutions, Springer, Singapore, 21-26, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3xc7Ev4.

Slaper, T. F., & Hall, T. J. (2011). The triple bottom line: What is it, and how does it work. Indiana business review, 86(1), 4-8, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3m0yoJP.

J. H. Spangenberg. (2005). Economic sustainability of the economy: concepts and indicators. International journal of sustainable development, 8(1-2), 47-64, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3nPmVxg.

Van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & De Hollander, A. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being: Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. Landscape and urban planning, 65(1-2), 5-18, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3glDO0C.

Warburton, D. (2013). Community and sustainable development: participation in the future. Routledge, Dunstan House 14a St Cross Street London EC1N 8XA, UK. Earths can, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3kVQATP.

Wellard, K., Rafanomezana, J., Nyirenda, M., Okotel, M., & Subbey, V. (2013). A review of community extension approaches to innovation for improved livelihoods in Ghana, Uganda, and Malawi. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 19(1), 21-35, https://bit.ly/3q1QVYE.

Xing, Y., Horner, R. M. W., El-Haram, M. A., & Bebbington, J. (2009). A framework model for assessing sustainability impacts of urban development. In Accounting forum, 33(3), 209-224, Retrieved from https://bit.ly/3fASNDf.

Downloads

Published

28-10-2022

How to Cite

Micabalo, K. G. (2022). Assessment for a Sustainable Livelihood Driver: The Economic, Social and Environmental Viewpoint of a Community Extension Program. Asian Review of Social Sciences, 11(2), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2022.11.2.3240

Most read articles by the same author(s)