Interconnection of Modules of Reconfigurable Modular Robots: A Review

Authors

  • Pardeep Kumar Mechanical Engineering Section, Yadavindra College of Engineering, Punjabi University Guru Kashi Campus, Talwandi Sabo, Distt. Bathinda, Punjab – 147 002, India
  • Buta S. Sidhu Dean Academics, Punjab Technical University, Punjab -144 601, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51983/ajeat-2012.1.2.2494

Keywords:

Self-reconfigurable Modular Robots, Simulation, Image Recognition, Module Docking, MatLab

Abstract

Robots normally perform pre-specified tasks in a predictable environment, like that on shop floor. Normally, assembly-line like operations are performed by robots due to geometrical and programming constraints. Rapidly changing requirments at customer level has greatly influenced the manufacturing technology, due to the risk of obsolescence. Multiple small robots called modules, interconnect with each other its own, to make a great structure are called self reconfigurable modular robots. For few modules, a large number of configurations are possible. As per the level of difficulty of the task, it can take any shape, to complete the work. Each module of the modular robot has its built-in intelligence with separate memory, connection assemblies, detectors and actuators to operate it. Such robots are highly useful in remote operations, especially in hostile environments. For physical docking of the connection plates of the modules, the connection plates should be properly aligned towards each other. This review paper enlightens the capabilities of the modular reconfigurable robots and the techniques explored by some researchers in this field, for proper alignment of the connection plates, for physical docking of modules. Position sensors like hall-effect sensors; and proximity sensors like infrared (IR) detectors and emitters have been used for docking of connection plates of the modules. Controlling and coordinating modules to work together effectively and not collide or otherwise interfere with each other is a bottleneck in this concept. Some work using IR intensity to guide the alignment of the modular robots have already been undertaken. Possibility for the use of MatLab by Mathworks is explored to simulate the alignment for interconnection of Modules of Reconfigurable Modular Robot using data captured by the CCD camera through image recognition.

References

G.Pritschow (1986), “A New Modular Robot System”, Annals of CIRP, Vol.35/1/1986, pp. 89-92.

Murata et.al. (2001), “Concept of re-configurable modular robotic system”, Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 15, pp. 383-387.

Fu et.al. (2012), “Design of miniature switchable connection system for stochastic modular robots”, Sensors and Actuators A, 173, pp. 267-276.

Yim Mark et.al. (2002), “Modular Robots,” pp 30-34 www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/publicfeature/feb02/mrobo.html#f1

T. Fukuda, Y. Kawauchi, Cellular robotic system (CEBOT) as one of the realization of self-organizing intelligent universal manipulators, in: Proc. of the 1990 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation,1990, pp. 662–667.

Hossein Sadjadi et al., “Design and Implementation of HexBot: A Modular Self-reconfigurable System”, J. Franklin Inst. (2011), doi:10.1016/j.jfranklin.2011.05.022

T. Fukuda, S. Nakagawa, “A dynamically reconfigurable robotic system”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation, 1987, pp. 588– 595.

Yim Mark et.al. (2003), “Connecting and disconnecting for chain self-reconfiguration with PolyBot,” in Special issue on Information Technology in Mechatronics, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

Fei Yanqiong and Zhao Xifang, “Design and dock analysis for the interactive module of a lattice-based self-reconfigurable robot”, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2007, 55, pp. 87-95

Yim Mark et.al. (2000), “PolyBot: a modular reconfigurable robot,” in International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, California, USA, IEEE, pp. 514–520. 8998

Suh J.W. et.al. (2002), “Telecubes: mechanical design of a module for a self-reconfigurable robotics,” in International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Washington, DC, USA, May 2002, IEEE, pp. 4095–4101.

Casal A. and Yim M. (1999), “Self-Reconfiguration Planning for a Class of Modular Robots,” in Proc. of SPIE, Volume 3839, 1999.

Roufas K. et.al. (2001), “Six Degree of Freedom Sensing for Docking Using IR RED Emitters and Receivers,” in Experimental Robotics VII, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences 271, Daniela Rus and Sanjiv Singh Eds. Springer.

Yang Guilin and Chen I-Ming (………), “Kinematic Calibration of Modular Reconfigurable Robots” in School of Mechanical and Production Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798

H.R. Everett (1989), “Survey of Collision Avoidance and Ranging Sensors in Mobile Robots”, North-Holland Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 5 (1989) pp. 5-67.

Ljung Lennart (2001), “Identification and Toolbox user guide”, Ver. 5.0, System The mathworks, Natick, Massachusetts.

Ljung Lennart (2000) “Simulink and Toolbox user guide”, Ver. 4.0, The mathworks, Natick, Massachusetts.

“Matlab User Guide”, www.mathworks.com.

Brandao Fernando et.al., “Programming Robotic & Automation Applications from Matlab,” Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Coimbra, Portugal. brandao, vaz, [email protected]/norberto/matlab.htm

Downloads

Published

05-11-2012

How to Cite

Kumar, P., & Sidhu, B. S. (2012). Interconnection of Modules of Reconfigurable Modular Robots: A Review. Asian Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology, 1(2), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.51983/ajeat-2012.1.2.2494