Political Choices of the Left and the Right in Crises: An Experimental Investigation

Authors

  • Ishan Kashyap Hazarika Department of Economics, Hansraj College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
  • Sourabh Rai Department of Economics, Hansraj College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
  • Anjali Verma Department of Economics, Hansraj College, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2020.9.2.2807

Keywords:

Political Choices, Crises, Experimental Investigation

Abstract

While numerous studies have documented the difference in choice behaviour of the political Left and the Right, the effect of situations of a crisis on political choices have remained unexplored. This study aims to record and analyse such effects and investigate if any differences or similarities appear in the two groups. The study uses an experimental approach to the problem. Samples of leftists and rightists in India are randomly provided with forms to vote in either a normal situation or a hypothetical situation of crisis. The difference in voting behaviour in the two scenarios is noted. The difference in the change in the voting behaviour of the Left and the Right is also noted. It is found as expected that under normal circumstances, the Left and the Right have different voting patterns. But under crisis, when their leader performs badly, they shift to the opposite leader with almost the same probability. Also, not only the effect, but the voting patterns themselves become very similar during crises. The behaviour of the Left and Right sustain differences only in normal circumstances, but under crises, the differences may no longer remain extant.

References

Heywood, A. (2017). Political Ideologies: An Introduction (6th Ed.). Basingstoke: McMillan International Higher Education. 14-17.

Feather, N. T. (1979). Value Correlates of Conservatism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(9), 1617-1630. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.9.1617

Dobson, A. (1995). Green Political Thought (3rd Ed.). 27-28.

Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.

Choma, B., Hanoch, Y., Hodson, G., and Gummerum, M. (2014). Risk Propensity among Liberals and Conservatives: The Effect of Risk Perception, Expected Benefits and Risk Domain. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 713-721. DOI: 10.1177/1948550613519682.

Carlson, F., Daruwala, D., and Johanson, S. O. (2005). Are People Inequality-Averse or Just Risk Averse? Economica, 72(287), 375-396.

Choma, B. L., Hanoch, Y., Gummerun, M., and Hodson, G. (2013). Risk Propensity among Liberals and Conservatives: The Effect of Risk Perception, Expected Benefits and Risk Domain. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(1), 29-34.

Murray, D. R., Schaller, M., and Suedfeld, P. (2013). Pathogens and Politics: Further Evidence that Parasite Prevalence Predicts Authoritarianism. PLOS One, 8(5), e62275. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062275.

Everett, J. A. C. (2013). The 12-Item Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS). PLOS One, 8(12), e82131. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082131.

Downloads

Published

25-11-2020

How to Cite

Hazarika, I. K., Rai, S., & Verma, A. (2020). Political Choices of the Left and the Right in Crises: An Experimental Investigation. Asian Review of Social Sciences, 9(2), 56–60. https://doi.org/10.51983/arss-2020.9.2.2807