Students’ Satisfaction and Learning: Assessment of Teaching-Learning Process in Knowledge Organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2024.14.1.3798Keywords:
Perception, Teaching-Learning Process, Satisfaction, General Regulatory Teaching, Preparation for Learning, Regulatory Assessment, Student Planning, Perception of LearningAbstract
This study aims to assess parameters like student perception and student satisfaction towards the interactive teaching-learning process (TLP), which may help teachers at different educational levels to teach more effectively. The teaching-learning process included general regulatory teaching, teacher preparation for learning, regulatory assessment, and student perception and planning for learning. A questionnaire was administered to a sample of classes 11th and 12th with various streams, including Mathematics, Biology, and Commerce as their majors in Central India. This study examined the impact of student perception on their satisfaction with the teaching-learning process (TLP). The results indicated that students’ perception of general regulatory teaching, preparation for learning & regulatory assessment significantly impact their satisfaction towards TLP, but preparation for learning and Regulatory assessment were not associated to satisfaction with teaching. However, it resulted in student learning positively. The findings further indicated that student satisfaction and learning are not different in-stream and class level.
References
Akram, A., Fu, C., Li, Y., Javed, M. Y., Lin, R., Jiang, Y., & Tang, Y. (2019). Predicting students’ academic procrastination in blended learning course using homework submission data. IEEE Access, 7, 102487-102498.
Almahasees, Z., Mohsen, K., & Amin, M. O. (2021, May). Faculty’s and students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID-19. In Frontiers in Education, 6. Frontiers Media SA.
Annamdevula, S., & Bellamkonda, R. S. (2016). The effects of service quality on student loyalty: the mediating role of student satisfaction. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(2), 446-462.
Bastick, T. (1995). Why teacher trainees choose the teaching profession: Comparing trainees in metropolitan and developing countries. International Review of Education, 46(3-4), 343-349.
Benei, V. (2008). Schooling passions: Nation, history, and language in contemporary Western India. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
Bhatnagar, D., & Nathani, N. (2013). Student Satisfaction in Professional Education in Gwalior. International Journal of Human Resource Management and Research (IJHRMR), 3(2), 71-76.
Bhattacharjee, J. (2015). Constructivist approach to learning–an effective approach of Teaching-Learning. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(4), 23-28.
Bottoms, G., Presson, A., & Johnson, M. (1992). Making high schools work. Southern Regional Education Board, Atlanta.
Camarero, C., Rodriguez, J., & San José, R. (2010). A comparison of the learning effectiveness of live cases and classroom projects. International Journal of Management Education, 8(3), 83-94.
Cashin, W. E., & Downey, R. G. (1992). Using global student rating items for summative evaluation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 563-572.
Chanda, R., & Betai, N. (2022). Higher Education Institutions. India Higher Education Report 2021: Private Higher Education, 33.
Colker, L. (2008). Twelve characteristics of effective early childhood teachers. Young Children, 63(2), 68-73.
Cremonini, L., Westerheijden, D., & Enders, J. (2008). Disseminating the right information to the right audience-cultural determinants in the use (and misuse) of rankings. Higher Education, 56(2), 373-385.
Davis, T. M., & Murrell, P. H. (1993). Turning Teaching into Learning. The Role of Student Responsibility in the Collegiate Experience. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 8. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports, The George Washington University, One Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC. 20036-1183.
de la Fuente Arias, J., Martínez Vicente, J. M., Peralta Sánchez, F. J., & García Berbén, A. B. (2010). Percepción del proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje y rendimiento académico en diferentes contextos instruccionales de la Educación Superior. Psicothema, 22(4), 806-812.
de la Fuente, J., & López-Medialdea, A. M. (2007). RDI Advising Model for improving the teaching-learning process. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5(3), 879-908.
De la Fuente, J., Cano, F., Justicia, F., Pichardo, M.C., García-Berbén, A.B., Martínez-Vicente, J.M. y Sanders, P. (2007). Efectos de usar herramientas electrónicas en la mejora de la regulación del proceso enseñanza-aprendizaje. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5(3), 757-782.
Department of School Education & Literacy, Ministry of Education. (2022). 2 years National Education Policy (NEP, 2020). Retrieved from https://dsel.education.gov.in/sites/default/files/infocus/Nep_ 2020.pdf on May 4, 2023.
Drennan, J., Kennedy, J., & Pisarski, A. (2005). Factors affecting student attitudes toward flexible online learning in management education. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(6), 331-338.
Elliott, K. M., & Healy, M. A. (2001). Key factors influencing student satisfaction related to recruitment and retention. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10(4), 1-11.
Elliott, K. M., & Shin, D. (2002). Student satisfaction: An alternative approach to assessing this important concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(2), 197-209.
Elliott, S.N., Kratochwill, T.R., Littlefield Cook, J. & Travers, J. (2000). Educational psychology: Effective teaching, effective learning (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill College.
Entwistle, N., & McCune, V. (2004). The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 325-345.
Ferguson, R. F. (2012). Can student surveys measure teaching quality? Phi Delta Kappan, 94(3), 24-28.
Fernando, S. Y., & Marikar, F. M. (2017). Constructivist Teaching/Learning Theory and Participatory Teaching Methods. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 6(1), 110-122.
Gill A., Herbert G., Mathur N., Nagpal V. (2011). Gender Differences and Factors that Improve Student Educational Satisfaction: A Study among Indian Commerce Students. Res Manageria, 2(5), 27-37.
Griggs, V, Blackburn, M and Smith, J. (2012). The Educational Scorecard: The Start of our Journey. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 10(2), 121-131.
Hyun, J., Ediger, R., & Lee, D. (2017). Students’ Satisfaction on Their Learning Process in Active Learning and Traditional Classrooms. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 108-118.
Iswati, L. (2021). When teaching must go on: ESP teachers’ strategies and challenges during COVID-19 Pandemic. Eralingua: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing dan Sastra, 5(1), 36-52.
Ivić, Sonja. (2017). Teaching strategies and students satisfaction with the teaching process. PhD Thesis. Filozofski fakultet u Zagrebu, Department of Pedagogy.
Ke, F., & Kwak, D. (2013). Constructs of student-centered online learning on learning satisfaction of a diverse online student body: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(1), 97-122. doi: 10.2190/EC.48.1.e.
Khan, S. H. (2019). Constructivism: Towards A Paradigm Shift In Classroom Teaching & Learning. Scholarly Research Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, VOL- 6/51.
Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2009). Investigating preservice teachers’ professional growth in self-regulated learning environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 161.
Lachman, S. J. (1997). Learning is a process: Toward an improved definition of learning. The Journal of Psychology, 131(5), 477-480.
Lizzio A, Wilson K, Simons R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 27–52. doi: 10.1080/03075070120099359.
Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. (1993). The use of students’ evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 30(1), 217-251.
Mathur, G., & Chauhan, A. S. (2021). Teacher Evaluation of Institutional Performance: Managing Cultural Knowledge Infrastructure in Knowledge Organisations, International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, 17(4), 93-108.
Mohan P. Kumar (2010). Indian Education System: An Introspection. Retrieved from https://www.boloji.com/articles/7264/indian-education-system-an-introspection on December 26, 2019.
Nathani, N., Mathur, G., & Dwivedi, G. (2019). Social responsibility and academic achievement: A perceptual learning. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9, 5221-5226.
Nikou, S., & Maslov, I. (2022). Finnish university students’ satisfaction with e-learning outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(1), 1-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2022-0166.
Policy, D. N. E. (2019). Ministry of Human Resource Development. New Delhi. Retrieved from prsindia.org/report-summaries/ draftnational-education-policy-2019.
Punzón, I. M. A., & Lara, M. O. (2003). Perception of the Teaching-Learning Process in students from high-risk schools or contexts. Electronic Journal of Research In Educational Psychology, 1(2), 97-114.
Rohandi, R. (2017). Teaching And Learning Science: Students’ perspective. International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching (IJIET), 1(1), 16-31.
Ryans, D. G., & Gage, N. L. (1962). The Handbook of Research on Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 13(1), 89-99.
Sachithanandam, M., & Raju, G. (2019). A Study on Achievement in Commerce of Higher Secondary Students. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(1), 1-6.
Sahin, I. (2007). Predicting student satisfaction in distance education and learning environments. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 113-119.
Scerbo, M. W., Warm, J. S., Dember, W. N., & Grasha, A. F. (1992). The role of time and cuing in a college lecture. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17(4), 312-328.
Seethalakshmi, S., & Shyamala, K. (2022). NEP 2020 and school education–Through the eyes of academicians from Tamil Nadu. Journal of Statistics and Management Systems, 25(5), 1279-1291.
Sharma, Neetu. M. Shukla (2019). Concerns in Learning Confronted By Students of Commerce with Special Reference to Teaching-Learning Process. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 7(6), 1987-1990.
Sharma, R. N., & Sharma, R. K. (1996). History of education in India. Atlantic Publishers & Dist.
Sinclaire, J. K. (2011). Student satisfaction with online learning: Lessons from organizational behavior. Research in Higher Education Journal, 11, 1-18.
Singh, B., & Mishra, P. (2017). Process of Teaching and Learning: A Paradigm Shift. International Journal of Education, 7, 31-38.
Sjoberg, S. (2007). Constructivism and Learning. In E. Baker, B. McGaw and P. Peterson, (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd edition.) Oxford, Elsevier.
Suarman, Suarman. (2015). Teaching Quality and Students Satisfaction: The Intermediatory Role of Relationship between Lecturers and Students of the Higher Learning Institutes. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6. Doi: 10.5901/mjss. 2015.v6n2p626.
Tanner, K., & Allen, D. (2004). Approaches to biology teaching and learning: learning styles and the problem of instructional selection - engaging all students in science courses. Cell Biology Education, 3(4), 197-201.
Taylor, J. S., Brites, R., Correia, F., Farhangmehr, M., Ferreira, B., Machado, M. L., et al., (2008). Strategic enrolment management: Improving student satisfaction and success in Portugal. Higher Education Management and Policy, 20(1), 129-145.
Vijayakumar, S., & Ramesh Babu, V. (2018). The Mobile Learning Enhances the Quality of Learning: A Study. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 8(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.51983/ ijiss.2018.8.1.508.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 The Research Publication
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
(Indexed in August 2023)
