Trends and Patterns in Collaborative Authorship: Insights into Advancing Seed Technology Research

Authors

  • T. C. Thirunavukkarasu Ph.D. Research Scholar, Department of Library and Information Science, Alagappa University, Tamil Nadu, India
  • S. Thanuskodi Professor & Head, Department of Library and Information Science, Alagappa University, Tamil Nadu, India
  • N. Suresh Librarian, Government Law College, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2024.14.1.4004

Keywords:

Seed Technology, Scientometrics, Authorship Pattern, Collaboration Index, Citation, Time Series Analysis, Sustainable Agriculture

Abstract

Seed technology is an essential area of study for healthy and profitable agricultural practices. The study’s results will assist in evaluating and advancing seed technology. It will encourage seed technologists and research institutions to improve their performance and review their research policies. The study also highlights that the double authorship pattern (two authors) was the dominant trend in seed technology research, followed closely by the three-authored pattern. It was observed that collaborative authorship was more dominant than single authorship, with 91.3% of publications following this pattern, while only 8.7% of publications were authored by a single person. The years 2014, 2016, and 2017 saw the highest degree of collaboration. The most productive author was Lamont BB with a total of 50 publications. The top-cited author was Shewry PR, affiliated with Rothamsted Research in Harpenden, England, who received 3495 citations for 37 publications.

References

Balamurugan, T., & Thanuskodi, S. (2019). Use of social networking sites among the college students in Tamil Nadu, India. Library Philosophy and Practice.

Balu, M., Supreeti, D., & Sabitri, M. (2011). Research Productivity of Agricultural Scientists of Central Rice Research Institute (CRRI), Cuttack: A Study. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 1(1), 60-66.

Chattopadhyay, T., & Ash, M. (2019). A Bibliometric Study of ‘IASLIC Bulletin’: 1996–2016. Quest-The Journal of UGC-HRDC Nainital, 13(3), 143. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-0035.2019.00021.4.

Fu, H. Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2015). Highly Cited Canada Articles in Science Citation Index Expanded: A Bibliometric Analysis. Canadian Social Science, 11(3), 50-62.

Garg, M., & Priya. (2019). Accountability in Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Library Herald, 57(3), 327. https://doi.org/10.5958/0976-2469.2019.00019.8.

Kane, D. A., Rogé, P., & Snapp, S. S. (2016). A systematic review of perennial staple crops literature using topic modeling and bibliometric analysis. PLoS ONE, 11(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155788.

Liu, B., Zhang, L., & Wang, X. (2017). Scientometric profile of global rice research during 1985-2014. Current Science, 112(5), 1003–1011. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v112/i05/1003-1011.

Mumtaj Begum, H. (2022). Scientometric Analysis of the Research Paper Output on Artificial Intelligence: A Study. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 12(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2022.12.1.3160.

Nove E. Variant Anna. (2018). Library and Information (LIS) Research Topics in Indonesia from 2006 to 2017, Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1773.

Patel, V. (2018). Scientometrics Analysis of Contributions to Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research during 2010-2016. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 8(1), 58-63.

Poornima, A., Surulinathi, M., Amsaveni, N., & Vijayaragavan, M. (2011). Mapping the Indian research productivity of food science and technology: A scientometric analysis. Food Biology, 1(1), 36-41.

Prakash, M., & Jayaprakash, M. (2019). Mapping of Deforestation Research across the Globe: A Scientometric Assessment on Web of Science Database. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 9(2), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss.2019.9.2.627

Pratheepan, T. (2019). Global Publication Productivity in Materials Science Research: A Scientometric Analysis. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 9(1), 111-116. https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss.2019.9.1.583.

Rajendran, L. (2019). Banana Study Publications: A Scientometric Evaluation on Cab Direct for the Period 1978-2018. AJIST, 9(3), 44-47.

Ramakrishnan, J., Ravi Sankar, G., & Thavamani, K. (2022). A Scientometric Study on Neuroanatomy Literature. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 12(1), 34-46. https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2022.12.1.3102.

Sagar, A., Kademani, B. S., & Bhanumurthy, K. (2014). Agriculture research in India: A scientometric mapping of publications. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 34(3), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.34.5022.

Sankar, M., & Srinivasaragavan, S. (2012). A Scientometric Study of Authorship Collaboration in Agricultural Research from 1970 – 2012. AJIST, 2(2).

Downloads

Published

13-03-2024

How to Cite

Thirunavukkarasu, T. C., Thanuskodi, S., & Suresh, N. (2024). Trends and Patterns in Collaborative Authorship: Insights into Advancing Seed Technology Research. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 14(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2024.14.1.4004