Thin Film Funding and Research Output of India and China: A Comparative Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss.2020.10.2.494Keywords:
Thin Film, China, India, Scientometric, Web of Science (WoS), NSFC, Funding Agency, Document type, Research ProductivityAbstract
The present study analyzes the funded and non-funded Indian and Chinese thin-film research output published from 2001 to 2019. The study reveals the different aspects of thin-film literature in top most five funding agencies in countries like India and China. China contributed the highest research publications with 41,809 records by the support of 30,523 funding agencies papers with 50, 8318 citation contributions. The countries funded papers were 73.01% and Un-Funded Papers were only 32.51%. India has contributed a total number of research publications in the field of a thin film with 16,308 by the support of 8,724 funding agencies papers with 1, 03,577 citation contributions, India has total funded papers of only 45.36% and Un-Funded total Papers of 54.64, India has 857 journals published and 646 journals supported by the funding agency., China has 1138 journals published supported by 995 funding agencies.
References
Arbritis, A., & McCook, A. (2017). Cash bonuses for peer-reviewed papers go global. Science, Retraction Watch, 10 August, link.
Balasubramani, R., Siriwardena, A., & Abu, K. S. (2015). Science Funding Research Output in BRIC Countries: A Scientometric Analysis. 10th International CALIBER-201, 254-261.
Christine, L. (2014). Empowerment—the Amartya Sen Lecture, By Christine Lagarde Managing Director, International Monetary Fund. IMF Communication Department, 1-2.
Henry, C., Ghani, C., Haron, H., & Hamid, U. M. (2018). The Nexus between Funding and Research Output: A Case Study in Universiti Teknologi MARA. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.15), 368-372.
Heston, A., Summers, R., & Aten, B. (1912). Penn World Table Version 7.1. Center for International Comparisons of Production.
Hugar, J. G., Bachlapur, M. M., & Gavisiddappa, A. (2019). Research Contribution of Bibliometric Studies as Reflected in Web of Science from 2013 to 2017. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 2319, 1-14.
Hydarali, N. K. (2016). A Scientometric Analysis of Graphite Research in India: 1989–2014. Journal of Advancements in Library Sciences, 3(1), 6-12.
Indrani, M., & Murugan, C. (2017). Global Assessment of Fossil Fuels Research Output: a Scientometric Study. International Journal of Development Research, 7(11), 16737-16744.
Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2011). The Impact of Research Grant Funding on Scientific. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9-10), 1168–1177.
Kumar, S. (2018). Scientometric study of Research productivity of ARIES, Nainital. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 1680, 2-15.
Kumbar, P., & Biradar, N. (2015). Research Trends In Forensic Science: A Study Of Scientometric Analysis. International Journal of Research in Library Science, 1(2), 42-48.
O’Neill, J. (2001). Global Economics. Building Better Global Economic BRICs. link.09.09.2013.
O’Regan, B., & Gratzel, M. (1991). A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature, 353, 737–740.
OECD, S. (2015). Technology and Industry Scoreboard. Innovation for growth and society. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard, 156.
Rizvi, F., & Gorur, R. (n.d.). Higher Education in India’s Decade of Innovations. Investigating the pact between higher education and society.
Wang, X., Liu, D., Ding, K., & Wang, X. (2012). Science funding and research output: a study on 10 Countries. Scientometrics, 91, 591–599.
Economic Times.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 The Research Publication
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
