Attitude Towards Quality of Contents in Open Access Sources and Services among Management College Professionals in Karnataka

Authors

  • N. N. Prasad Librarian, Library and Information Centre, National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
  • M. Chandrashekara Professor, Department of Studies in Library and Information Science, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
  • Umesha Chief Librarian, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss.2018.8.3.540

Keywords:

Open Access, Management Education, Attitudes, Student’s Researchers, Faculty, E-Resources

Abstract

Research is one of the key elements that require special focus in management education at present. It has become imperative for management institutions to brace up to the challenges posed by globalisation, and augment the quality of research and allied activities. Researchers today can access resources online, anytime from anywhere—thanks to the “open access” movement, which enables free and unrestricted access to scientific research publications. The present study aimed at assessing and comparing attitude towards open access sources and services among students, researchers and faculty of management colleges in Karnataka. A total of 923 respondents were selected through stratified random sampling. Interview schedule was employed to obtain the required data from the respondents through a structured questionnaire based on vital aspects of open access sources and services. Findings of the study revealed that the respondents, on the whole, held favourable attitudes towards open access. It was found that the faculty group had significantly higher preferences than students and researchers for quality of contents in open access, in terms of increasing reputation of authors, publishers and organisations, and improving peer review process.

References

Kaplan, A. (2014). European management and European business schools: Insights from the history of business schools. European Management Journal.

Baruah, B. G. (2007). Role of open access, open standards and open sources in libraries: A study. Gandhinagar: INFLIBNET Centre, 378-391.

Lustig, M. V. (2013). Intercultural competence, interpersonal communication across cultures. Content Technologies, Inc.

Management. (n.d.). Business Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/management.html.

Mills, M. (2016). A case for authoring multi-touch interactive open educational resources. Techtrends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning, 60(5), 456-464. doi:10.1007/s11528-016-0097-5.

Onzonol, S. I. (2010). Management education: The best is yet to come. In From challenge to change: Business schools in the wake of financial crisis (A compendium of essays put together by Global Foundation for Management Education). Retrieved from http://www.gfme.org/pdf/complete_web.pdf.

Prasad, L., & Gulsha, S. S. (2011). Management principles and practice. Excel Books India, 272.

Regan, S. (2016). Strategies for expanding e-journal preservation. Serials Librarian, 70(1-4), 89-99. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2016.1144159.

Sinha, D. P. (2004). Management education in India, perspective and challenges, pp. 100. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.in/.

Tenopir, C., Levine, K., Allard, S., Christian, L., Volentine, R., Boehm, R., & Watkinson, A. (2016). Trustworthiness and authority of scholarly information in a digital age: Results of an international questionnaire. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 67(10), 2344-2361. doi:10.1002/asi.23598.

Downloads

Published

03-11-2018

How to Cite

Prasad, N. N., Chandrashekara, M., & Umesha. (2018). Attitude Towards Quality of Contents in Open Access Sources and Services among Management College Professionals in Karnataka. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services, 8(3), 94–97. https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss.2018.8.3.540