Proficiency Building of Non-Academic Libraries in the Context of Present LIS Education in India: A Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss.2019.9.1.580Keywords:
Proficiency Building, Non-Academic Libraries, LIS Education, Formal Education, Informal EducationAbstract
The study reveals that non-academic libraries are gradually becoming more important with specialized needs of the users. It also makes a call for library professionals to nurture the skillful activities with concern and commitments. However innovative ventures of professionalism could be effective to satisfy greater demands in a better way. Unfortunately professional courses don’t have any reflection in their curricula to cope with the services of non-academic libraries. LIS schools are not that much aware of designing of their syllabi at per with the demand of non-academic libraries. Enough scope is there to introduce specialized courses for multi-modal service generation via corporate librarianship, digital scholarship, technical writings, and cooperative information delivery – thus make the relevance of the study. An attempt has been made to evaluate the present scenario of non-academic libraries and to understand the professional requirements; so as to build-up the proficiency (competency, skill, expertise) in this sector by revitalizing the LIS courses in an Indian context.
References
Mole, A. J. C., Dim, C. L., & Horsfall, N. (2017). Re-engineering LIS education to meet industrial needs for knowledge societies. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 49(3), 313–319.
Magrill, R. M. (1985). Evaluation by type of library. Library Trends, 33(3).
Lopatin, L. (2010). Metadata practices in academic and non-academic libraries for digital projects: A survey. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 48(8), 716-742.
Ahmed, W., & Soroya, M. S. (2016). Library and information science education as an ignition source for services in non-academic special libraries. Library Review, 65(4/5), 350-368.
Harhai, M., & Krueger, J. (2016). Competency-based professional development. Journal of Library Administration, 56(8), 939-956.
Hamid, A., & Soroya, M. S. (2015). Current trends of continuing education programs in LIS profession. Pakistan Library & Information Science Journal, 46(3), 4-12.
O’Brien, H. L., Freund, L., Jantzi, L., & Sinanan, S. (2014). Investigating a peer-to-peer community service learning model for LIS education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 55(1), 322-335.
Mahesh, G., Kumar, N., & Gupta, D. K. (2010). Short-term Library and Information Science Training Courses in India. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 30(5), 56-60.
Crockett, M. (2007). Continuing professional development and the hallmarks of professionalism: An overview of the current environment for the record-keeping profession. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 28(1), 77-102.
Tammaro, A. M. (2005). Recognition and quality assurance in LIS: New approaches for lifelong learning in Europe. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 6(2), 67-79.
Cooke, N. A. (2012). Professional development 2.0 for librarians: Developing an online personal learning network (PLN). Library Hi Tech News, 29(3), 1-9.
Date, D. A., & Walavalkar, P. (2009). Technology-enhanced learning: A TCS Library experience. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 29(1), 49-55.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 The Research Publication
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
